My Photo
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 03/2005

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

« Unborn Between Barack and a Hard Place | Main | Why Believe in Air? »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54ecb4e398833010535e6eef8970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference In the Stu-Stu-Studio:

Comments

Paul S.

With the landscape, I can feel the mastery in it - that is, the vigorous handling of it. I absolutely love how you did the transparency of the water, showing the submerged logs, merging directly into the reflected blue and the water lilies. It feels very direct without that cloying heavy-handedness, or over-saturated precision you see in so many landscapes where the transparency of water, or the layers of grass, or the depth of snow, or any other difficult thing to depict becomes a mere technicality for the artist to mindlessly repeat or imitate in his vast ouvre of ability. And while this landscape is fresh it is also deep; most importantly, it resonates.

And the smaller ones, lets just say looking at them makes me want the subjects in front of me for real.

e.

Tim J.,

" I'm edging my way up to launching a painting-a-day art "

This sounds rather interesting; yet, could you really produce a painting-a-day without compromising the quality as well as the 'art'?

Tim J.

One of the things that drew me to consider the Painting-A-Day thing was that many of the artists I have seen doing it maintain a very high level of quality and creativity. The good artists do very good work very consistently.

The two small paintings above took only a few hours each.

The larger one took perhaps 6 or 7 hours.

The thing about painting is, the more you do it - and the more often you do it - the better you get. It isn't like an artist only has so much art in them. It's more a question of continually developing your skills, your perception, etc...

The painters I know and admire most paint every day (or practically every day).

e.

Tim J.,

I defer to you since, clearly, you're an artist whose expertise would know better.

It's just I don't see how one can produce these things each day without running into the errors committed by mass production.

The products that result may end up being but an inferior imitation to the art where much time and thought was uniquely devoted.

Professio

Tim,
When I first got to this post, I thought the painting was a photograph. After zooming in, I could clearly see it was a painting, but what a beautiful painting it is. Everything about it is great: composition, lighting, colors, but what I like most is how you were able to give the logs that waterlogged look and the water around them the murky haze you would expect to see.

Stunning. Awesome job.

Adam D

the paintings are fantastic! Congratulations.

Thomas E. Vaughan

The wine glass is rendered from a perspective that is peculiarly close to the glass. It gives the sense of being very close to the goods.

J.R. Stoodley

My two cents for the large painting is that the water struck me, in both the small version and when I clicked on it to see it bigger, as being sharper, clearer than what it was reflecting, which is interesting, though I don't know if it was intended or if it's just me that it looks like that to.

My two cents for the smaller paintings is that like many of the paintings with food and drink as their theme I could see them in a restaurant. I mean that in the best possible way. They would add class to an establishment and they have a way of stimulating the appetite.

pNielsen

Your observations on your landscapes in comparison to your still lifes are astute, and I'd agree with them. Your still lifes have always been quite a lot stronger in my opinion.

I quite like your strokes and technique in the landscape above, but feel the composition is still a bit lacking.

I really like the wine glass with cheese.

ukok

i love blue cheeses...oh yum, you can keep the wine as i'm a teetotaller, but i could happily gaze at a picture of cheese....yummy!

On a serious note. Your work is brilliant. One of my other arty friends also did the painting a day thing, well actually i think it was more a drawing/pastel a day thinking back, but it is achievable. I think it's important to set yourself a designated time period which you can comitt to, or otherwise you could let people know that you will do it for as long as you have the time and inclination...otherwise you could people saying 'hey where is todays painting!'

e.

Tim J.,

Hey, where is today's painting?!

Bill

Tim,

Can I just say that I enjoy all of your work, but that Guinness is inspirational. I'm verklempt.

Seriously though, great work and I hope you continue to find the obvious joy your work brings to you. I think a painting a day will serve you, and us, very well.

Tim J.

"The wine glass is rendered from a perspective that is peculiarly close to the glass. It gives the sense of being very close to the goods."

That's true, actually. I usually sit pretty close to my setup, and that can tend to give an exaggerated perspective. I'll have to watch that and make sure it doesn't become distracting.

pNielsen

Where's a link to the new blog?

Tim J.

I haven't actually launched it yet. I'll let you know, believe me.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment